Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261348AbUJXAr5 (ORCPT ); Sat, 23 Oct 2004 20:47:57 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261349AbUJXAr5 (ORCPT ); Sat, 23 Oct 2004 20:47:57 -0400 Received: from linux01.gwdg.de ([134.76.13.21]:3999 "EHLO linux01.gwdg.de") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261348AbUJXAry (ORCPT ); Sat, 23 Oct 2004 20:47:54 -0400 Date: Sun, 24 Oct 2004 02:47:40 +0200 (MEST) From: Jan Engelhardt To: David Masover cc: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Markus_T=F6rnqvist?= , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, reiserfs-list@namesys.com Subject: Re: 2.6.9-mm1 In-Reply-To: <417B1574.4090406@slaphack.com> Message-ID: References: <20041023165712.GR26192@nysv.org> <417B1574.4090406@slaphack.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 870 Lines: 23 >| Stupid question, why have small keys at all? >| >| Someone said once that he didn't want to use large keys because they added >| no value to him and small keys wasted less space. If there are people like >| this around, burying it is not cool, but if there aren't, maybe small keys >| should be ripped out? >| >Some people don't care about speed but need space. I'd leave them in on >general principle, even if no one wants them now. How much space would be gained after all on, say, a 200 GB partition? Jan Engelhardt -- Gesellschaft f?r Wissenschaftliche Datenverarbeitung Am Fassberg, 37077 G?ttingen, www.gwdg.de - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/