Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261235AbUJYEWC (ORCPT ); Mon, 25 Oct 2004 00:22:02 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261360AbUJYEWC (ORCPT ); Mon, 25 Oct 2004 00:22:02 -0400 Received: from ozlabs.org ([203.10.76.45]:132 "EHLO ozlabs.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261235AbUJYEWA (ORCPT ); Mon, 25 Oct 2004 00:22:00 -0400 Subject: Re: [RFC/PATCH] Per-device parameter support From: Rusty Russell To: tj@home-tj.org Cc: mochel@osdl.org, lkml - Kernel Mailing List In-Reply-To: <20041023042024.GA3456@home-tj.org> References: <20041023042024.GA3456@home-tj.org> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Mon, 25 Oct 2004 14:21:57 +1000 Message-Id: <1098678117.8098.7.camel@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.0.2 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 779 Lines: 23 On Sat, 2004-10-23 at 13:20 +0900, tj@home-tj.org wrote: > Hello, > > I rewrote the document, debugged and splitted devparam patch. I'm > attaching the document in this mail and posting 16 patches > (dp_01 - dp_16) which are against Linus's bk tree as of today. Hi TJ, Love the idea: thanks for doing this work! I'm reviewing the patches themselves now, but I'll mainly concentrate on your moduleparam changes which I'm not sure are necessary. Cheers, Rusty. -- A bad analogy is like a leaky screwdriver -- Richard Braakman - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/