Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261521AbUJYGNv (ORCPT ); Mon, 25 Oct 2004 02:13:51 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261534AbUJYGNv (ORCPT ); Mon, 25 Oct 2004 02:13:51 -0400 Received: from parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk ([195.92.249.252]:38023 "EHLO www.linux.org.uk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261521AbUJYGMt (ORCPT ); Mon, 25 Oct 2004 02:12:49 -0400 Message-ID: <417C9955.4030507@pobox.com> Date: Mon, 25 Oct 2004 02:12:37 -0400 From: Jeff Garzik User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.7.3) Gecko/20040922 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Joshua Kwan CC: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Serious stability issues with 2.6.10-rc1 References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 985 Lines: 28 Joshua Kwan wrote: > Hello, > > 2.6.10-rc1 seems to have a tendency to lock up after about 8 hours or so > of uptime. Usually, I am in X, listening to music, and working on > something when this happens out of the blue. It's a hard hang and there is > no network response or ability to switch back to a tty so i can get > sysrq-t output. It just dies. This has happened twice in the past 48 or > so hours. > > I can't really provide much debugging info though, due to the nature of > the hang. Is there anything that pops into mind that I should try to nail > this problem? > > 2.6.9 seems to be a lot better at staying alive. Could you please search through the various 2.6.9-bk snapshots, to see where this behavior starts? Jeff - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/