Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261771AbUJYM0t (ORCPT ); Mon, 25 Oct 2004 08:26:49 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261772AbUJYM0t (ORCPT ); Mon, 25 Oct 2004 08:26:49 -0400 Received: from omx1-ext.sgi.com ([192.48.179.11]:34214 "EHLO omx1.americas.sgi.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261771AbUJYM0s (ORCPT ); Mon, 25 Oct 2004 08:26:48 -0400 Date: Mon, 25 Oct 2004 07:26:28 -0500 From: Dimitri Sivanich To: "Paul E. McKenney" Cc: Ingo Molnar , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, karim@opersys.com Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH] Restricted hard realtime Message-ID: <20041025122628.GA2400@sgi.com> References: <20041023194721.GB1268@us.ibm.com> <20041023201724.GA23936@elte.hu> <20041024181842.GB1262@us.ibm.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20041024181842.GB1262@us.ibm.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 611 Lines: 14 On Sun, Oct 24, 2004 at 11:18:42AM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote: > Dimitri, one nit so far... Why is sched_domain_dummy under two > layers of #ifdef CONFIG_SMP? Any reason why the attached patch > would not be in order? > Paul, this specific code wasn't part of my original patch, but after looking at it briefly, I believe this patch should make sense. Dimitri - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/