Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id <S136218AbRDVQ7W>; Sun, 22 Apr 2001 12:59:22 -0400
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org
	id <S136219AbRDVQ7L>; Sun, 22 Apr 2001 12:59:11 -0400
Received: from paloma15.e0k.nbg-hannover.de ([62.159.219.15]:18682 "HELO
	paloma15.e0k.nbg-hannover.de") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP
	id <S136218AbRDVQ65>; Sun, 22 Apr 2001 12:58:57 -0400
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="iso-8859-1"
From: Dieter =?iso-8859-1?q?N=FCtzel?= <Dieter.Nuetzel@hamburg.de>
Organization: DN
To: Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Subject: Re: Linux 2.4.3-ac12
Date: Sun, 22 Apr 2001 19:26:11 +0200
X-Mailer: KMail [version 1.2]
Cc: "Linux Kernel List" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        "Andrea Arcangeli" <andrea@suse.de>, feedback@suse.de
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-Id: <01042219261100.01104@SunWave1>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

> My belief however is that several million people have gcc 2.96-69+, about 50
> are likely to have random cvs snapshots and none of them are going to build
> kernels with them anyway, as they wont work __builtin_expect or otherwise.
>
> Alan

I will not add fuel to the fire, but isn't 2.4.XX the "stable" version?
And I think most people (here in Europe :-) are running 2.95.2 at the moment.
But, yes the previously patches fixed it.

Thanks,
	Dieter
-- 
Dieter N?tzel
Graduate Student, Computer Science

University of Hamburg
Department of Computer Science
Cognitive Systems Group
Vogt-K?lln-Stra?e 30
D-22527 Hamburg, Germany

email: nuetzel@kogs.informatik.uni-hamburg.de
@home: Dieter.Nuetzel@hamburg.de
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/