Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sun, 22 Apr 2001 14:42:38 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sun, 22 Apr 2001 14:42:20 -0400 Received: from router-100M.swansea.linux.org.uk ([194.168.151.17]:1553 "EHLO the-village.bc.nu") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Sun, 22 Apr 2001 14:41:33 -0400 Subject: Re: Linux 2.4.3-ac12 To: jes@linuxcare.com (Jes Sorensen) Date: Sun, 22 Apr 2001 19:42:51 +0100 (BST) Cc: alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk (Alan Cox), rmk@arm.linux.org.uk (Russell King), philb@gnu.org (Philip Blundell), junio@siamese.dhis.twinsun.com, manuel@mclure.org (Manuel McLure), linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: from "Jes Sorensen" at Apr 22, 2001 06:12:16 PM X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.5 PL1] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: From: Alan Cox Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > In principle you just need 2.7.2.3 for m68k, but someone decided to > raise the bar for all architectures by putting a check in a common > header file. I suspect you would find that some of the problems with the initialisers in structures were common to 2.7.2 across all platforms, but I may be wrong > Maybe it's time to move that check to the arch include dir instead? I have no problem there - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/