Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sun, 22 Apr 2001 15:54:07 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sun, 22 Apr 2001 15:53:58 -0400 Received: from jalon.able.es ([212.97.163.2]:22456 "EHLO jalon.able.es") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Sun, 22 Apr 2001 15:53:43 -0400 Date: Sun, 22 Apr 2001 21:53:36 +0200 From: "J . A . Magallon" To: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Dieter_N=FCtzel?= Cc: Alan Cox , Linux Kernel List , Andrea Arcangeli , feedback@suse.de Subject: Re: Linux 2.4.3-ac12 Message-ID: <20010422215336.A2240@werewolf.able.es> In-Reply-To: <01042219261100.01104@SunWave1> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <01042219261100.01104@SunWave1>; from Dieter.Nuetzel@hamburg.de on Sun, Apr 22, 2001 at 19:26:11 +0200 X-Mailer: Balsa 1.1.4 Lines: 21 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 04.22 Dieter N?tzel wrote: > > My belief however is that several million people have gcc 2.96-69+, about 50 > > are likely to have random cvs snapshots and none of them are going to build > > kernels with them anyway, as they wont work __builtin_expect or otherwise. > > > > Alan > > I will not add fuel to the fire, but isn't 2.4.XX the "stable" version? > And I think most people (here in Europe :-) are running 2.95.2 at the moment. > But, yes the previously patches fixed it. > That's going to change in a few weeks, I suspect. Dunno about SuSE, but just released Mandrake 8.0 and RedHat 7.1 ship gcc-2.96. -- J.A. Magallon # Let the source mailto:jamagallon@able.es # be with you, Luke... Linux werewolf 2.4.3-ac12 #1 SMP Sun Apr 22 10:27:22 CEST 2001 i686 - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/