Subject: Re: PROPOSAL:  New NEW development model
From: Josh Boyer <jdub@us.ibm.com>
To: John Richard Moser <nigelenki@comcast.net>
Cc: William Lee Irwin III <wli@holomorphy.com>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
In-Reply-To: <417E966D.8090208@comcast.net>
References: <417E8422.3020009@comcast.net>
	 <20041026174730.GL17038@holomorphy.com>  <417E966D.8090208@comcast.net>
Content-Type: text/plain
Message-Id: <1098817715.9350.2.camel@weaponx.rchland.ibm.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Date: Tue, 26 Oct 2004 14:08:35 -0500
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 694
Lines: 20

On Tue, 2004-10-26 at 13:24, John Richard Moser wrote:
> 
> | This is not useful to distinguish your "suggestion" from the status quo.
> |
> 
> Help me out here, what's the status quo?

Pretty much exactly what you described already.  Instead of "Volatile"
being name 2.7, it's essentially 2.6.N-rcX.  (Or whatever Linus has
chosen as the new naming convention for as yet to be released stuff.)

At least that's how your proposal reads to me.

josh

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/