Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261424AbUJZUSL (ORCPT ); Tue, 26 Oct 2004 16:18:11 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261430AbUJZUQ4 (ORCPT ); Tue, 26 Oct 2004 16:16:56 -0400 Received: from wproxy.gmail.com ([64.233.184.194]:50033 "EHLO wproxy.gmail.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261403AbUJZUQI (ORCPT ); Tue, 26 Oct 2004 16:16:08 -0400 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:references; b=V0hfZ+5+jRPuVaY5rppRkwzaRSLGXPUGV7t2RX98gDkX7G0i4tGx9Ws+cz2LH4fIO3TLpzQiOrxGMqCPXTAcedvTCpyD3F6STo3pu6L5GJ7E8+hmjow+oD8wgZmLbkrpXURdHDLwGHNZmeTEDcs4vo8B8bexzfx47It9lEW43WY= Message-ID: <4d8e3fd304102613165b2fb283@mail.gmail.com> Date: Tue, 26 Oct 2004 22:16:08 +0200 From: Paolo Ciarrocchi Reply-To: Paolo Ciarrocchi To: Linus Torvalds , Andrew Morton , William Lee Irwin III , "Randy.Dunlap" , alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk Subject: Let's make a small change to the process Cc: linux-kernel In-Reply-To: <877jpdcnf5.fsf@barad-dur.crans.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit References: <200410260644.47307.edt@aei.ca> <00c201c4bb4c$56d1b8b0$e60a0a0a@guendalin> <4d8e3fd3041026050823d012dc@mail.gmail.com> <877jpdcnf5.fsf@barad-dur.crans.org> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1124 Lines: 31 Hi all, despite I know you are all bored with the " I know how to improve the process" email but I want to share with you this idea .-) Both Andrew and Linus are doing an impressive job so I really don't think we need to change the way they are working. What I'm suggesting is start offering 2.6.X:Y kernel, you did for 2.6.8.1 so... The .Y patchset contains only important security fix (all stuff you think are important) and is weekly uploaded to kernel.org Doing that, people: - can stop running "personal version of vanilla kernel - don't need to wait till next Linus' release in order to have a security bug fixed We, of course, need a maintainer for it, maybe someone from OSDL (Randy?), maybe wli (he maintained his tree for a long time), maybe Alan (that is already applying these kind of fixes to his tree), maybe someone else... ? Sounds reasonable ? -- Paolo - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/