Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261575AbUJ0CVQ (ORCPT ); Tue, 26 Oct 2004 22:21:16 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261560AbUJ0CVQ (ORCPT ); Tue, 26 Oct 2004 22:21:16 -0400 Received: from siaag2ad.compuserve.com ([149.174.40.134]:49384 "EHLO siaag2ad.compuserve.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261575AbUJ0CVH (ORCPT ); Tue, 26 Oct 2004 22:21:07 -0400 Date: Tue, 26 Oct 2004 22:17:16 -0400 From: Chuck Ebbert <76306.1226@compuserve.com> Subject: Re: Let's make a small change to the process To: Paolo Ciarrocchi Cc: Randy Dunlap , linux-kernel , William Lee Irwin III , Dave Jones , Alan Cox Message-ID: <200410262220_MC3-1-8D36-77F@compuserve.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 705 Lines: 20 On Tue, 26 Oct 2004 at 22:44:21 +0200 Paolo Ciarrocchi wrote: > >> 2.6-ac seems to be filling this role right now. >> > > If the goal of -ac is to only include those fixes, why can't we rename > it in something more "intuitive" for the final users ? > Do you see what I mean ? AFAICT -ac is not supposed to be a complete collection of bugfixes. 2.6.9-ac3 was certainly missing a lot of them (haven't seen -ac4 yet.) --Chuck Ebbert 26-Oct-04 20:33:14 - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/