Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S262507AbUJ0Q3N (ORCPT ); Wed, 27 Oct 2004 12:29:13 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S262505AbUJ0Q2q (ORCPT ); Wed, 27 Oct 2004 12:28:46 -0400 Received: from wproxy.gmail.com ([64.233.184.207]:28696 "EHLO wproxy.gmail.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S262512AbUJ0QWI (ORCPT ); Wed, 27 Oct 2004 12:22:08 -0400 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:references; b=nMoWPEqMEhi3X90pKaXchY8ETNK27hn5N4hC0aRlwI8RmnJvtt2x24ewv+FB2hL/v3OLombNPQqOFopD9qjw/WfnHjddB9nasvdoZZqdnjnUM4Kr634ZZqSDnYjEQIX13EHWjGsKXIviRsP/lSxNoI0SugFAwrgpCL736s569Bc= Message-ID: <58cb370e04102709221d6a9103@mail.gmail.com> Date: Wed, 27 Oct 2004 18:22:04 +0200 From: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz Reply-To: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz To: gene.heskett@verizon.net Subject: Re: [BK PATCHES] ide-2.6 update Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, torvalds@osdl.org, linux-ide@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <200410271215.55472.gene.heskett@verizon.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit References: <58cb370e04102706074c20d6d7@mail.gmail.com> <200410271215.55472.gene.heskett@verizon.net> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1225 Lines: 35 On Wed, 27 Oct 2004 12:15:55 -0400, Gene Heskett wrote: > On Wednesday 27 October 2004 09:07, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote: > >Please do a > > > > bk pull bk://bart.bkbits.net/ide-2.6 > > > >This will update the following files: > > > > drivers/ide/ide-disk.c | 1 + > > drivers/ide/ide-dma.c | 32 > > Even after fixing the 4 wrapped lines in the patch, I'm not going in > cleanly here: > > patching file drivers/ide/ide-dma.c > Hunk #1 FAILED at 681. > 1 out of 1 hunk FAILED -- saving rejects to file > drivers/ide/ide-dma.c.rej > > The first 'grep' line of the patch is found at an offset of about +180 > lines in the original file. > > The rest of it seems to have found a home, but at offsets in excess of > 159 lines for a few of them. > > This was against a 2.6.9 tree, and 2.6.9-mm1 failed in similar > fashion. What src tree is this to be applied to? current linus' -bk tree, latest -bk snapshot should also be OK - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/