Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S262552AbUJ0RRi (ORCPT ); Wed, 27 Oct 2004 13:17:38 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S262516AbUJ0RQj (ORCPT ); Wed, 27 Oct 2004 13:16:39 -0400 Received: from clock-tower.bc.nu ([81.2.110.250]:39071 "EHLO localhost.localdomain") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S262542AbUJ0RMc (ORCPT ); Wed, 27 Oct 2004 13:12:32 -0400 Subject: Re: Would auto setting CONFIG_RTC make sense when building SMP kernel? From: Alan Cox To: Jesper Juhl Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <1098893383.4304.21.camel@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.6 (1.4.6-2) Date: Wed, 27 Oct 2004 17:09:44 +0100 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 573 Lines: 13 On Maw, 2004-10-26 at 20:13, Jesper Juhl wrote: > Isn't it always desirable to be able to set the clock in an SMP compatible > fashion if the kernel is indeed build for SMP? Probably it is best to just move it to CONFIG_EMBEDDED. Without the driver the clock binary bitbangs the cmos and that isnt safe non SMP either nowdays - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/