Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S262544AbUJ0R32 (ORCPT ); Wed, 27 Oct 2004 13:29:28 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S262573AbUJ0R01 (ORCPT ); Wed, 27 Oct 2004 13:26:27 -0400 Received: from fire.osdl.org ([65.172.181.4]:3528 "EHLO fire-1.osdl.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S262544AbUJ0RSQ (ORCPT ); Wed, 27 Oct 2004 13:18:16 -0400 Message-ID: <417FD4C0.20107@osdl.org> Date: Wed, 27 Oct 2004 10:02:56 -0700 From: "Randy.Dunlap" Organization: OSDL User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.8 (X11/20040913) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gene.heskett@verizon.net CC: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz , torvalds@osdl.org, linux-ide@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [BK PATCHES] ide-2.6 update References: <58cb370e04102706074c20d6d7@mail.gmail.com> <200410271215.55472.gene.heskett@verizon.net> <58cb370e04102709221d6a9103@mail.gmail.com> <200410271305.06265.gene.heskett@verizon.net> In-Reply-To: <200410271305.06265.gene.heskett@verizon.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1771 Lines: 58 Gene Heskett wrote: > On Wednesday 27 October 2004 12:22, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote: > >>On Wed, 27 Oct 2004 12:15:55 -0400, Gene Heskett >> >> wrote: >> >>>On Wednesday 27 October 2004 09:07, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz > > wrote: > >>>>Please do a >>>> >>>>bk pull bk://bart.bkbits.net/ide-2.6 >>>> >>>>This will update the following files: >>>> >>>>drivers/ide/ide-disk.c | 1 + >>>>drivers/ide/ide-dma.c | 32 >>> >>>Even after fixing the 4 wrapped lines in the patch, I'm not going >>>in cleanly here: >>> >>>patching file drivers/ide/ide-dma.c >>>Hunk #1 FAILED at 681. >>>1 out of 1 hunk FAILED -- saving rejects to file >>>drivers/ide/ide-dma.c.rej >>> >>>The first 'grep' line of the patch is found at an offset of about >>>+180 lines in the original file. >>> >>>The rest of it seems to have found a home, but at offsets in >>>excess of 159 lines for a few of them. >>> >>>This was against a 2.6.9 tree, and 2.6.9-mm1 failed in similar >>>fashion. What src tree is this to be applied to? >> >>current linus' -bk tree, latest -bk snapshot should also be OK > > > Drat. I can't afford bitkeeper, either the time or the resources. > So I assume this will be in 2.6.10-rc2 or 3? Gene, BK isn't required. Just get the daily snapshot from http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v2.6/snapshots/ and apply it to 2.6.10-rc1 (or whatever is latest). -- ~Randy MOTD: Always include version info. (Again. Sometimes I think ln -s /usr/src/linux/.config .signature) - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/