Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Mon, 23 Apr 2001 05:30:31 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Mon, 23 Apr 2001 05:30:21 -0400 Received: from router-100M.swansea.linux.org.uk ([194.168.151.17]:9988 "EHLO the-village.bc.nu") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Mon, 23 Apr 2001 05:30:08 -0400 Subject: Re: All architecture maintainers: pgd_alloc() To: miles@megapathdsl.net (Miles Lane) Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2001 10:31:39 +0100 (BST) Cc: davem@redhat.com (David S. Miller), rmk@arm.linux.org.uk (Russell King), linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: from "Miles Lane" at Apr 22, 2001 09:59:32 PM X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.5 PL1] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: From: Alan Cox Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > Alan, could you delegate any of this work? Is it feasible to > have you redirect some portion of the patch analysis and acceptance > load to another person, other than Linus? Obviously, if the rate To be honest I get very little patch material I didnt want to track. I get lots of patches that are wrong, misguided, or otherwise flawed. However I want to see those patches so I can help get them fixed. On the whole people seem to be fairly good at sending stuff to obvious maintainers. Sometimes I bounce a few on. Big global changes to vm/vfs I tend to ignore because those kind of things tend to be stuff Linus cares a lot about getting right anyway. Alan - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/