Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S262642AbUJ1BgA (ORCPT ); Wed, 27 Oct 2004 21:36:00 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S262669AbUJ1BgA (ORCPT ); Wed, 27 Oct 2004 21:36:00 -0400 Received: from fw.osdl.org ([65.172.181.6]:29830 "EHLO mail.osdl.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S262642AbUJ1Bfl (ORCPT ); Wed, 27 Oct 2004 21:35:41 -0400 Date: Wed, 27 Oct 2004 18:34:58 -0700 (PDT) From: Linus Torvalds To: Roman Zippel cc: Andrea Arcangeli , Larry McVoy , Joe Perches , Paolo Ciarrocchi , Jeff Garzik , Linux Kernel , Larry McVoy , Andrew Morton Subject: Re: BK kernel workflow In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: <20041023161253.GA17537@work.bitmover.com> <4d8e3fd304102403241e5a69a5@mail.gmail.com> <20041024144448.GA575@work.bitmover.com> <4d8e3fd304102409443c01c5da@mail.gmail.com> <20041024233214.GA9772@work.bitmover.com> <20041025114641.GU14325@dualathlon.random> <1098707342.7355.44.camel@localhost.localdomain> <20041025133951.GW14325@dualathlon.random> <20041025162022.GA27979@work.bitmover.com> <20041025164732.GE14325@dualathlon.random> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1977 Lines: 54 On Thu, 28 Oct 2004, Roman Zippel wrote: > > Linus, what happened to the early promises, that the data wouldn't be > locked into bk? Is the massively reduced data set in the cvs repository > really all we ever get out of it again? Roman, I'm not going to bother fighing your idiotic issues any more. The data is all there, and has been there since day one. That's what the patches are, that's what the tar-balls I do are, and that's what the snapshots that others do are. All there. Since day one. Go away now. > You can play this game with every license Absolutely. And I do. What's so hard to understand with the single sentence: "Don't complain about other peoples licenses." And no, it has _nothing_ to do with the GPL vs BK. It's a general truism. The fact is, developers can choose whatever license they want for their own code. And users can choose whatever program they want, as long as they follow that license. And it's _their_ decisions. > I don't care what tools you use, I don't care if I can't use them, but > why is it acceptable for you to cut off _any_ possibility for me to > archive the same result in some other way? But I don't. If you don't like BK, use the tar-balls. It's exactly the same source tree. And no, if you don't use BK, you can't use the BK tree. Well DUH! And if you want to go write your own SCM, and use your own SCM for doing your own Linux development, be my guest. But stop whining about choices that OTHER people made, and that you don't have anything to do with. As it is, you're nothing but an uninvited religious nut at my door, trying to convince me on your nut-case religion. Sorry, I'm not buing it. *BLAM* Linus - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/