Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Mon, 23 Apr 2001 08:32:22 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Mon, 23 Apr 2001 08:32:13 -0400 Received: from parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk ([195.92.249.252]:29202 "EHLO www.linux.org.uk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Mon, 23 Apr 2001 08:32:07 -0400 Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2001 13:32:02 +0100 From: Russell King To: "David S. Miller" Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: All architecture maintainers: pgd_alloc() Message-ID: <20010423133202.A26121@flint.arm.linux.org.uk> In-Reply-To: <20010421154455.C7576@flint.arm.linux.org.uk> <15075.45847.624767.960502@pizda.ninka.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <15075.45847.624767.960502@pizda.ninka.net>; from davem@redhat.com on Sun, Apr 22, 2001 at 09:44:07PM -0700 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sun, Apr 22, 2001 at 09:44:07PM -0700, David S. Miller wrote: > I really would wish folks would not choose Alan as the first place > to send the patch. I'm not directly accusing anyone of it, but it > does appear that often AC is used as a "back door" to get a change > in. While this scheme most of the time, often it unnecessarily > overworks Alan which I think is unfair. The reason I suggested sending this stuff to Alan is because it _needs_ to be reviewed or tested before coming out in Linus tree, and I know that Linus is trying to get 2.4.4 out. Last time I checked, ARM can't run a Sparc kernel. ;) -- Russell King (rmk@arm.linux.org.uk) The developer of ARM Linux http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/personal/aboutme.html - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/