Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S262826AbUJ1I3Y (ORCPT ); Thu, 28 Oct 2004 04:29:24 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S262827AbUJ1I3Y (ORCPT ); Thu, 28 Oct 2004 04:29:24 -0400 Received: from 168.imtp.Ilyichevsk.Odessa.UA ([195.66.192.168]:23564 "HELO port.imtp.ilyichevsk.odessa.ua") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S262826AbUJ1I3W (ORCPT ); Thu, 28 Oct 2004 04:29:22 -0400 From: Denis Vlasenko To: Michael Clark , Linux Kernel Subject: Re: 2.6.9 page allocation failure. order:0, mode:0x20 Date: Thu, 28 Oct 2004 11:29:09 +0300 User-Agent: KMail/1.5.4 References: <41808419.8070104@metaparadigm.com> In-Reply-To: <41808419.8070104@metaparadigm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="koi8-r" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200410281129.09810.vda@port.imtp.ilyichevsk.odessa.ua> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 463 Lines: 13 On Thursday 28 October 2004 08:31, Michael Clark wrote: > BTW - 2.6 is much more responsive than 2.4 while this is all > going on - i'm just worried about these messages. Which one was faster, and by how much? -- vda - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/