Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S262842AbUJ1JQc (ORCPT ); Thu, 28 Oct 2004 05:16:32 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S262846AbUJ1JQb (ORCPT ); Thu, 28 Oct 2004 05:16:31 -0400 Received: from fw.osdl.org ([65.172.181.6]:7583 "EHLO mail.osdl.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S262842AbUJ1JPU (ORCPT ); Thu, 28 Oct 2004 05:15:20 -0400 Date: Thu, 28 Oct 2004 02:13:17 -0700 From: Andrew Morton To: Martin Schwidefsky Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [patch] cputime: introduce cputime. Message-Id: <20041028021317.48a6d0c2.akpm@osdl.org> In-Reply-To: References: <20041027224805.31f5747b.akpm@osdl.org> X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.9.7 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-redhat-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 620 Lines: 18 Martin Schwidefsky wrote: > > > - kernel threads may have null p->signal > > - remove some deoptimising inlines > > Does it work with these two changes ? Well it doesn't crash ;) It compiles OK on a bunch of architectures, bloats the kernel by 2k and various system monitoring tools emit sensible-looking numbers. What should I be looking for? - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/