Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S262856AbUJ1Jm6 (ORCPT ); Thu, 28 Oct 2004 05:42:58 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S262862AbUJ1Jin (ORCPT ); Thu, 28 Oct 2004 05:38:43 -0400 Received: from cantor.suse.de ([195.135.220.2]:32682 "EHLO Cantor.suse.de") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S262863AbUJ1Jgw (ORCPT ); Thu, 28 Oct 2004 05:36:52 -0400 To: Andrew Morton Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, schwidefsky@de.ibm.com Subject: Re: [patch] cputime: introduce cputime. References: <20041027224805.31f5747b.akpm@osdl.org.suse.lists.linux.kernel> <20041028021317.48a6d0c2.akpm@osdl.org.suse.lists.linux.kernel> From: Andi Kleen Date: 28 Oct 2004 11:36:51 +0200 In-Reply-To: <20041028021317.48a6d0c2.akpm@osdl.org.suse.lists.linux.kernel> Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 807 Lines: 19 Andrew Morton writes: > Martin Schwidefsky wrote: > > > > > - kernel threads may have null p->signal > > > - remove some deoptimising inlines > > > > Does it work with these two changes ? > > Well it doesn't crash ;) > > It compiles OK on a bunch of architectures, bloats the kernel by 2k and > various system monitoring tools emit sensible-looking numbers. What should > I be looking for? 2K sounds definitely wrong. Martin's patch should be ideally a nop for architectures that use asm-generic/cputime.h -Andi - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/