Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S262996AbUJ1Mm0 (ORCPT ); Thu, 28 Oct 2004 08:42:26 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S262988AbUJ1Mm0 (ORCPT ); Thu, 28 Oct 2004 08:42:26 -0400 Received: from parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk ([195.92.249.252]:55251 "EHLO www.linux.org.uk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S262996AbUJ1MmD (ORCPT ); Thu, 28 Oct 2004 08:42:03 -0400 Date: Thu, 28 Oct 2004 08:01:37 -0200 From: Marcelo Tosatti To: "Barry K. Nathan" Cc: "O.Sezer" , jbaron@redhat.com, alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Linux 2.4.28-rc1 Message-ID: <20041028100137.GI4815@logos.cnet> References: <417E5904.9030107@ttnet.net.tr> <20041027025222.GB9375@ip68-4-98-123.oc.oc.cox.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20041027025222.GB9375@ip68-4-98-123.oc.oc.cox.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.5.1i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1603 Lines: 38 On Tue, Oct 26, 2004 at 07:52:22PM -0700, Barry K. Nathan wrote: > On Tue, Oct 26, 2004 at 05:02:44PM +0300, O.Sezer wrote: > > There are many lost/forgotten patches posted here on lkml. Since 2.4.28 > > is near and 2.4 is going into "deep maintainance" mode soon, I gathered > > a short list of some of them. There, sure, are many more of them, but > > here it goes. > > I think they deserve a re-review and re-consideration for inclusion. > [snip] > > Here's another one: > Jason Baron: 2.4.28-pre3 tty/ldisc fixes > http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-kernel&m=109604869516678&w=2 > > AFAICT the above patch is the fix for: > CAN-2004-0814: Linux terminal layer races > http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=bugtraq&m=109837405025108&w=2 > > This patch seems to be working fine for me, but I don't know if anyone > else has really tested it at all, nor do I know (one way or the other) > if the security issues are serious enough to apply this for 2.4.28-rc > and not 2.4.29-pre. Also, I'm running on a single-processor system with > no HyperThreading, so if there are any SMP-related issues then I have no > way of experiencing them. > > Anyway, since it's a security fix (unless I'm mistaken), I guess it's > worth considering for inclusion... Hi Barry, I think this should be applied as well. The next -pre makes me more comfortable. Jason, Alan? - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/