Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S262530AbUJ1RRk (ORCPT ); Thu, 28 Oct 2004 13:17:40 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S262184AbUJ1RRk (ORCPT ); Thu, 28 Oct 2004 13:17:40 -0400 Received: from atlrel9.hp.com ([156.153.255.214]:43707 "EHLO atlrel9.hp.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S262530AbUJ1ROs (ORCPT ); Thu, 28 Oct 2004 13:14:48 -0400 From: Bjorn Helgaas To: James Morris Subject: Re: Fw: Re: 2.6.10-rc1-mm1 Date: Thu, 28 Oct 2004 11:14:39 -0600 User-Agent: KMail/1.7 Cc: Andrew Morton , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-acpi@intel.com References: In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200410281114.39861.bjorn.helgaas@hp.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 992 Lines: 20 On Thursday 28 October 2004 12:25 am, James Morris wrote: > On Wed, 27 Oct 2004, Bjorn Helgaas wrote: > > I did find a couple places that unregister the driver even when > > acpi_bus_register_driver() fails, which could cause this. But I > > really doubt that this is the problem, because the only error > > returns there are for "acpi_disabled" and "!driver". Patch is > > attached anyway if you want to try it. > > This looks to have fixed the problem. Hmmm. Can you add a little more debug (i.e., the printk in acpi_bus_unregister_driver(), and some in the acpi_bus_register_driver() failure paths)? I really don't understand how that patch could have fixed the problem, and I hate to paper over a problem without understanding it better. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/