Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S263100AbUJ1XpO (ORCPT ); Thu, 28 Oct 2004 19:45:14 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S263099AbUJ1XpA (ORCPT ); Thu, 28 Oct 2004 19:45:00 -0400 Received: from cantor.suse.de ([195.135.220.2]:52966 "EHLO Cantor.suse.de") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S263100AbUJ1XiN (ORCPT ); Thu, 28 Oct 2004 19:38:13 -0400 Date: Fri, 29 Oct 2004 01:38:05 +0200 From: Andi Kleen To: James Cleverdon Cc: Chris Wright , ak@suse.de, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] clustered apic patch missing APIC_DFR_CLUSTER def Message-ID: <20041028233805.GA11384@wotan.suse.de> References: <20041028112715.D14339@build.pdx.osdl.net> <200410281635.23848.jamesclv@us.ibm.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200410281635.23848.jamesclv@us.ibm.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 729 Lines: 17 On Thu, Oct 28, 2004 at 04:35:23PM -0700, James Cleverdon wrote: > Hmmm... The patch containing APIC_DFR_CLUSTER and friends went > into the -mm tree in the June/July timeframe. It must not have > been pushed with the main cluster patch. Andrew moved it into the x86-64 kexec APIC patch for some unknown reason. And that obviously was not pushed ... I already sent a patch to Linus and will send patches for the other known buglets too (warnings, safe_smp_processor_id()) -Andi - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/