From: Blaisorblade <blaisorblade_spam@yahoo.it>
To: DaMouse <damouse@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [patch 1/1] uml: fix mainline lazyness about TTY layer patch
Date: Fri, 29 Oct 2004 01:36:13 +0200
User-Agent: KMail/1.7.1
Cc: "blaisorblade_spam@yahoo.it" <blaisorblade_spam@yahoo.it>,
       LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
References: <20041028200635.3366D7436@localhost> <1a56ea39041028132610a1579e@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <1a56ea39041028132610a1579e@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
Message-Id: <200410290136.13385.blaisorblade_spam@yahoo.it>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 1228
Lines: 38

On Thursday 28 October 2004 22:26, DaMouse wrote:
> On Thu, 28 Oct 2004 22:04:51 +0200, blaisorblade_spam@yahoo.it
>
> <blaisorblade_spam@yahoo.it> wrote:
> > While changing the TTY layer, an API parameter was removed, so it was
> > removed by almost all calls, changing their prototype. But one use of one
> > such function was not updated, breaking UML compilation. This is the fix.
> >
> > Should go in directly - trivial fix.
> >
> > Thanks for the breakage, too :-).

>
> http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=lazyness
> NOW who's lazy :P

Ok, I've flamed a bit, and I get it back.

I'm not English, however that does not qualify as a good reason.

> -DaMouse
> -- 
> I know I broke SOMETHING but its their fault for not fixing it before me

Is that the signature or the actual answer :-)?

However, let's code well, ok? (I don't know whether you're the author, but 
however, that's not the problem).

Bye
-- 
Paolo Giarrusso, aka Blaisorblade
Linux registered user n. 292729
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/