Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S263583AbUJ2Xqn (ORCPT ); Fri, 29 Oct 2004 19:46:43 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S263727AbUJ2XqU (ORCPT ); Fri, 29 Oct 2004 19:46:20 -0400 Received: from cantor.suse.de ([195.135.220.2]:35549 "EHLO Cantor.suse.de") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S263695AbUJ2XkP (ORCPT ); Fri, 29 Oct 2004 19:40:15 -0400 Date: Sat, 30 Oct 2004 01:37:51 +0200 From: Andi Kleen To: Chris Wright Cc: ak@suse.de, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] remove duplicate FAKE_STACK_FRAME macro Message-ID: <20041029233751.GH31914@wotan.suse.de> References: <20041029161456.S2357@build.pdx.osdl.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20041029161456.S2357@build.pdx.osdl.net> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 663 Lines: 16 On Fri, Oct 29, 2004 at 04:14:56PM -0700, Chris Wright wrote: > Hi Andi, > > FAKE_STACK_FRAME macro is defined twice. The one that gets used is in > arch/x86_64/kernel/entry.S, and is slightly different codewise, although > should have the same end result (uses pushq rather than addq %rsp + movq > and has the extra dwarf annotations). Looks like we can remove the dups? Yes. Thanks. I added it to my tree. -Andi - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/