Date: Sun, 31 Oct 2004 02:33:46 +0100
From: Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de>
To: Suresh Siddha <suresh.b.siddha@intel.com>
Cc: jamesclv@us.ibm.com, ak@suse.de, akpm@osdl.org,
       linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [Patch] x86-64: fix sibling map again!
Message-ID: <20041031013346.GE19396@wotan.suse.de>
References: <20041029170215.A26372@unix-os.sc.intel.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20041029170215.A26372@unix-os.sc.intel.com>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 550
Lines: 13

On Fri, Oct 29, 2004 at 05:02:15PM -0700, Siddha, Suresh B wrote:
> That patch assumes BIOS for non-clustered systems accept the HW assigned
> value. Why make this assumption when we can fix it in a better fashion(which
> is also used by x86 kernel's today)

Thanks Suresh. I applied it to my tree.

-Andi
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/