Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261444AbUJaJN6 (ORCPT ); Sun, 31 Oct 2004 04:13:58 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261514AbUJaJN6 (ORCPT ); Sun, 31 Oct 2004 04:13:58 -0500 Received: from quechua.inka.de ([193.197.184.2]:31188 "EHLO mail.inka.de") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261444AbUJaJN5 (ORCPT ); Sun, 31 Oct 2004 04:13:57 -0500 Date: Sun, 31 Oct 2004 10:13:55 +0100 From: Bernd Eckenfels To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: LVM Oops Message-ID: <20041031091355.GA27407@lina.inka.de> References: <418428C6.7070707@staff.theuseful.com> <20041031022133.GA18294@taniwha.stupidest.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <20041031022133.GA18294@taniwha.stupidest.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040722i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1035 Lines: 21 On Sat, Oct 30, 2004 at 07:21:33PM -0700, Chris Wedgwood wrote: > Which version of XFS and when? The XFS block allocator uses more > stack in low-memory conditions and would over-flow 4K stacks > previously but Nathan made some changes which should make it better. It was some 2.4 version, but the stacktrace was not related to XFS I think. It was just that reproducible one got panic or oops (not sure) if the snapshot volumne was full. Hevent tried that with 2.6 yet, will do. Greetings Bernd -- (OO) -- Bernd_Eckenfels@M?rscher_Strasse_8.76185Karlsruhe.de -- ( .. ) ecki@{inka.de,linux.de,debian.org} http://www.eckes.org/ o--o 1024D/E383CD7E eckes@IRCNet v:+497211603874 f:+497211606754 (O____O) When cryptography is outlawed, bayl bhgynjf jvyy unir cevinpl! - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/