Subject: Re: [OT] Re: code bloat [was Re: Semaphore assembly-code bug]
From: Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
To: Ken Moffat <ken@kenmoffat.uklinux.net>
Cc: Lee Revell <rlrevell@joe-job.com>,
       Denis Vlasenko <vda@port.imtp.ilyichevsk.odessa.ua>,
       Tim Hockin <thockin@hockin.org>, Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>,
       Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de>,
       Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.58.0410310155080.11293@ppg_penguin.kenmoffat.uklinux.net>
References: <417550FB.8020404@drdos.com.suse.lists.linux.kernel>
	 <200410310111.07086.vda@port.imtp.ilyichevsk.odessa.ua>
	 <20041030222720.GA22753@hockin.org>
	 <200410310213.37712.vda@port.imtp.ilyichevsk.odessa.ua>
	 <1099178405.1441.7.camel@krustophenia.net>
	 <1099176751.25194.12.camel@localhost.localdomain>
	 <Pine.LNX.4.58.0410310155080.11293@ppg_penguin.kenmoffat.uklinux.net>
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: <1099233850.16420.9.camel@localhost.localdomain>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Date: Sun, 31 Oct 2004 14:44:11 +0000
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 787
Lines: 16

On Sul, 2004-10-31 at 01:09, Ken Moffat wrote:
> and the time to load it is irrelevant.  Since then I've had an anecdotal
> report that -Os is known to cause problems with gnome.  I s'pose people
> will say it serves me right for doing my initial testing on ppc which
> didn't have this problem ;)  The point is that -Os is *much* less tested
> than -O2 at the moment.

I've seen no real problems - x86-32 or x86-64, and my gnumeric appears
happy. Could be that the Red Hat gcc 3.3 has the relevant fixes already
in it from upstream I guess.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/