Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261697AbUJaXi0 (ORCPT ); Sun, 31 Oct 2004 18:38:26 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261456AbUJaXi0 (ORCPT ); Sun, 31 Oct 2004 18:38:26 -0500 Received: from mail15.syd.optusnet.com.au ([211.29.132.196]:24194 "EHLO mail15.syd.optusnet.com.au") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261697AbUJaXiM (ORCPT ); Sun, 31 Oct 2004 18:38:12 -0500 Message-ID: <41857745.6020808@kolivas.org> Date: Mon, 01 Nov 2004 10:37:41 +1100 From: Con Kolivas User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.8 (X11/20040913) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Pavel Machek Cc: linux kernel mailing list , Andrew Morton , Ingo Molnar , Peter Williams , William Lee Irwin III , Alexander Nyberg , Nick Piggin Subject: Re: [PATCH][plugsched 0/28] Pluggable cpu scheduler framework References: <4183A602.7090403@kolivas.org> <20041031233313.GB6909@elf.ucw.cz> In-Reply-To: <20041031233313.GB6909@elf.ucw.cz> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.86.1.0 X-Enigmail-Supports: pgp-inline, pgp-mime Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enig5FBA24471E0AF9965D7B1DB2" Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1671 Lines: 53 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enig5FBA24471E0AF9965D7B1DB2 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Pavel Machek wrote: > Hi! > > >>This code was designed to touch the least number of files, be completely >>arch-independant, and allow extra schedulers to be coded in by only >>touching Kconfig, scheduler.c and scheduler.h. It should incur no >>overhead when run and will allow you to compile in only the scheduler(s) >>you desire. This allows, for example, embedded hardware to have a tiny >>new scheduler that takes up minimal code space. > > > You are changing > > some_functions() > > into > > something->function() > > no? I do not think that is 0 overhead... Indeed, and I am performing microbenchmarks to see what measurable overhead there is and so far any difference is lost in noise. Cheers, Con --------------enig5FBA24471E0AF9965D7B1DB2 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFBhXdFZUg7+tp6mRURAoifAJ9AtzmzVR5pjJXM17XjHRrh2mJ9/wCgkFwX vicIqMjzsWlbtTHRJkkeO3U= =EOeb -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enig5FBA24471E0AF9965D7B1DB2-- - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/