Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261737AbUKAKQt (ORCPT ); Mon, 1 Nov 2004 05:16:49 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261744AbUKAKQt (ORCPT ); Mon, 1 Nov 2004 05:16:49 -0500 Received: from mproxy.gmail.com ([216.239.56.247]:60176 "EHLO mproxy.gmail.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261737AbUKAKQr (ORCPT ); Mon, 1 Nov 2004 05:16:47 -0500 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:references; b=iDm3tGsdUZGMpy6YyBd7tPHqm1fQhaYHd+djyXBm0GaDQvx5kLV0HonUAoMdRccd+VKhUCUuFRb/sCk60pwiN4MmER+J1QogTbS8c9ugpHdqgGqBIIR5blViq9pc+wBmbvZbPT8EnMBA9y0kSWppJZwzAcdJQbjJsew5PMW2qy8= Message-ID: <21d7e99704110102161132d37b@mail.gmail.com> Date: Mon, 1 Nov 2004 21:16:43 +1100 From: Dave Airlie Reply-To: Dave Airlie To: Egbert Eich Subject: Re: status of DRM_MGA on x86_64 Cc: Andi Kleen , Thomas Zehetbauer , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, idr@us.ibm.com In-Reply-To: <16774.1839.343824.305232@suse.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit References: <1099052450.11282.72.camel@hostmaster.org.suse.lists.linux.kernel> <1099061384.11918.4.camel@hostmaster.org.suse.lists.linux.kernel> <41829E39.1000909@us.ibm.com.suse.lists.linux.kernel> <1099097616.11918.26.camel@hostmaster.org.suse.lists.linux.kernel> <16774.1839.343824.305232@suse.de> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1191 Lines: 30 > > I solved it for RADEON, MGA and R128. > It would be interesting to solve this for the i915 driver, too, > and possibly some others. > > That it hasn't been merged into DRI yet is a shame. Appearantly > nobody has ever realized why this stuff is useful. Unfortunately > I don't have the time for lobbying it. > It's a very boring undertaking to have to port this from one DRI > version to the next. Ian, can you look at this I think you are the best person (maybe Keithw) to tell whether this stuff breaks compat in any direction,. Egbert you may not want to lobby for it but all I personally want to know is what it might potentially break in terms of backwards compatiblity.... from SuSEs point of view as long as a distro is consistent then you are okay, for us the whole keeping DRIs built against older kernels working with newer kernels is the only real issue... Hopefully Ian can look at the patch and decide on it.... Dave. Dave. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/