Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S266375AbUKAPGs (ORCPT ); Mon, 1 Nov 2004 10:06:48 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S269055AbUKAPGq (ORCPT ); Mon, 1 Nov 2004 10:06:46 -0500 Received: from relay01.roc.ny.frontiernet.net ([66.133.131.34]:55947 "EHLO relay01.roc.ny.frontiernet.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S268115AbUKAPGL (ORCPT ); Mon, 1 Nov 2004 10:06:11 -0500 From: Russell Miller To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: [OT] Re: code bloat [was Re: Semaphore assembly-code bug] Date: Mon, 1 Nov 2004 10:09:41 -0500 User-Agent: KMail/1.7 References: <417550FB.8020404@drdos.com.suse.lists.linux.kernel> <418550C1.1060203@comcast.net> <20041101154853.6b393f8a.diegocg@teleline.es> In-Reply-To: <20041101154853.6b393f8a.diegocg@teleline.es> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-15" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200411010909.41482.rmiller@duskglow.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1608 Lines: 37 On Monday 01 November 2004 08:48, Diego Calleja wrote: > Sadly it's true, but in the other hand I haven't seen something like > gnome/kde which don't eats lots of resources (mac os x and XP are not > better, beos was better they say) Part of the problem with KDE is the QT library underneath it all. QT 4 is supposed to be leaner and faster. The KDE folks seem to be trying pretty hard to reduce bloat whenever possible. But when you have software that's expected to have the kitchen sink, it's especially challenging to reduce the footprint while keeping all of the functionality. I use openbox on my laptop. It's nothing near KDE in terms of functionality, but it also runs reasonably snappy on a Pentium 266, so I can't complain too much. So far I'm pretty glad that the linux kernel developers have resisted putting graphics calls and routines into the kernel. It slows things down a bit, but I'd like to think you guys have learned from MS's mistakes. IMO one of the biggest mistakes they ever made was to pollute the NT kernel with the graphics subsystem. That said, FBUI looks like an interesting add-on project. Enough of my off topic ranting... --Russell -- Russell Miller - rmiller@duskglow.com - Le Mars, IA Duskglow Consulting - Helping companies just like you to succeed for ~ 10 yrs. http://www.duskglow.com - 712-546-5886 - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/