Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261178AbUKBXQh (ORCPT ); Tue, 2 Nov 2004 18:16:37 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S262695AbUKBXO0 (ORCPT ); Tue, 2 Nov 2004 18:14:26 -0500 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([66.187.233.31]:18910 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S262614AbUKBXLI (ORCPT ); Tue, 2 Nov 2004 18:11:08 -0500 Date: Tue, 2 Nov 2004 15:10:44 -0800 From: Pete Zaitcev To: Fabio Coatti Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, cs@tequila.co.jp, zaitcev@redhat.com Subject: Re: Test patch for ub and double registration Message-ID: <20041102151044.4270bc12@lembas.zaitcev.lan> In-Reply-To: <200411022257.24752.cova@ferrara.linux.it> References: <20041101164432.3fa72b81@lembas.zaitcev.lan> <200411022257.24752.cova@ferrara.linux.it> Organization: Red Hat, Inc. X-Mailer: Sylpheed-Claws 0.9.12cvs126.2 (GTK+ 2.4.13; i386-redhat-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 851 Lines: 25 On Tue, 2 Nov 2004 22:57:24 +0100, Fabio Coatti wrote: Dear Fabio, thank you for the test. Indeed, this is wrong: > i.e. no lines like > > uba: device 4 capacity nsec 1024000 bsize 512 > uba: uba1 Previously, it would retry capacity reading, quite by accident: the block level did revalidation several times when faced with unexpected responses from ub. The last one succeeded. I'd like to secure one last favour from you. Please do this for me: 1. Connect the thing 2. Run find /sys -name diag | xargs cat | mail -s "Flavio's ub diag" zaitcev@redhat.com Thanks a lot, -- Pete - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/