Date: Tue, 2 Nov 2004 22:32:29 +0000
From: Russell King <rmk+lkml@arm.linux.org.uk>
To: Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Driver Core patches for 2.6.10-rc1
Message-ID: <20041102223229.A10969@flint.arm.linux.org.uk>
Mail-Followup-To: Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
References: <1099346276148@kroah.com> <10993462773570@kroah.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5.1i
In-Reply-To: <10993462773570@kroah.com>; from greg@kroah.com on Mon, Nov 01, 2004 at 01:57:57PM -0800
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 1196
Lines: 25

On Mon, Nov 01, 2004 at 01:57:57PM -0800, Greg KH wrote:
> This patch fixes the problem by using a separate semaphore, called
> dpm_list_sem, to cover the places where we need the device pm lists to be
> stable, and by being careful about how we traverse the lists on suspend and
> resume.  I have analysed the various cases that can occur and I am
> confident that I have handled them all correctly.  I posted this patch
> together with a detailed analysis 10 days ago.

Does this mean that a device driver can have its suspend or resume
methods called in the middle of a probe or remove on a different CPU ?
(note: x86 APM does not freeze all processes last time I checked...)

If yes, has anyone audited the drivers to ensure that they're correct
in respect of this?

-- 
Russell King
 Linux kernel    2.6 ARM Linux   - http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/
 maintainer of:  2.6 PCMCIA      - http://pcmcia.arm.linux.org.uk/
                 2.6 Serial core
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/