Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Mon, 23 Apr 2001 22:57:21 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Mon, 23 Apr 2001 22:57:02 -0400 Received: from hilbert.umkc.edu ([134.193.4.60]:18194 "HELO tesla.umkc.edu") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id ; Mon, 23 Apr 2001 22:56:53 -0400 Message-ID: <3AE4EAEA.26F37BEB@kasey.umkc.edu> Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2001 21:54:34 -0500 From: "David L. Nicol" Organization: University of Missouri - Kansas City supercomputing infrastructure X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.77 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.4.0 i586) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Dale Amon CC: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Idea: Encryption plugin architecture for file-systems In-Reply-To: <01042121404701.08246@antares> <20010423211237.I26083@vnl.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Dale Amon wrote: > > Talk about syncronicity... I had just last week asked > about the pro's and con's on this on the crypto list and > have heard nothing at all back. So I'll drop the body > of that message in here: why not port one of the twenty or thirty preexisting tools that let you mount a filesystem from an encrypted file instead of making a generic layer? That way you could have inter-os portability. The steganographic ones make really impressive claims. Does linux have a truly generic plug-in file system module yet, or are people still hacking around fake nfs servers? -- David Nicol 816.235.1187 dnicol@cstp.umkc.edu "Described as awesome by users" - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/