Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261318AbUKCBxW (ORCPT ); Tue, 2 Nov 2004 20:53:22 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261327AbUKCBxW (ORCPT ); Tue, 2 Nov 2004 20:53:22 -0500 Received: from fw.osdl.org ([65.172.181.6]:11736 "EHLO mail.osdl.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261318AbUKCBxK (ORCPT ); Tue, 2 Nov 2004 20:53:10 -0500 Date: Tue, 2 Nov 2004 17:52:45 -0800 (PST) From: Linus Torvalds To: David Howells cc: Andrew Morton , davidm@snapgear.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, uclinux-dev@uclinux.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 12/14] FRV: Generate more useful debug info In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: <20041101162929.63af1d0d.akpm@osdl.org> <76b4a884-2c3c-11d9-91a1-0002b3163499@redhat.com> <200411011930.iA1JUMgs023243@warthog.cambridge.redhat.com> <5109.1099394496@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 750 Lines: 20 On Tue, 2 Nov 2004, Linus Torvalds wrote: > > That may not be true today, but what is true is that -O1 is not a light > thing to just do. And btw, in some cases the inlining used to be a correcness issue, so no, just making it be "static inline" doesn't necessarily fix the basic issue. Again, whether that is necessarily true today is not something I'm ready to guarantee one way or the other, so this is just an observation that things can be a lot more subtle than you seem to assume. Linus - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/