Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261638AbUKCPnp (ORCPT ); Wed, 3 Nov 2004 10:43:45 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261668AbUKCPnp (ORCPT ); Wed, 3 Nov 2004 10:43:45 -0500 Received: from cantor.suse.de ([195.135.220.2]:29414 "EHLO Cantor.suse.de") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261638AbUKCPlh (ORCPT ); Wed, 3 Nov 2004 10:41:37 -0500 Date: Wed, 3 Nov 2004 16:32:54 +0100 From: Andi Kleen To: Jean Delvare Cc: ak@suse.de, LKML , Andrew Morton , Greg KH Subject: Re: dmi_scan on x86_64 Message-ID: <20041103153254.GF24195@wotan.suse.de> References: <20041103144006.GE24195@wotan.suse.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 691 Lines: 18 On Wed, Nov 03, 2004 at 04:19:39PM +0100, Jean Delvare wrote: > > > > Any reason why dmi_scan is availble on the i386 arch and not on the > > > x86_64 arch? I would have a need for the latter (for run-time > > > identification purposes, not boot-time blacklisting). > > > > Here's a patch for testing. > > Thanks Andi. Unfortunately, I don't own an x86_64 system myself, so I Ok. I won't push the patch then when it isn't really needed. -Andi - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/