Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261881AbUKCUzH (ORCPT ); Wed, 3 Nov 2004 15:55:07 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261862AbUKCUvg (ORCPT ); Wed, 3 Nov 2004 15:51:36 -0500 Received: from pimout1-ext.prodigy.net ([207.115.63.77]:55959 "EHLO pimout1-ext.prodigy.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261877AbUKCUuT (ORCPT ); Wed, 3 Nov 2004 15:50:19 -0500 Date: Wed, 3 Nov 2004 12:49:54 -0800 From: Chris Wedgwood To: Christoph Hellwig , LKML , Andrew Morton Subject: Re: [PATCH] deprecate pci_module_init Message-ID: <20041103204954.GB11010@taniwha.stupidest.org> References: <20041103091039.GA22469@taniwha.stupidest.org> <20041103203331.GB23494@infradead.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20041103203331.GB23494@infradead.org> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 949 Lines: 24 On Wed, Nov 03, 2004 at 08:33:31PM +0000, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > There's nothing bad about it, it's a useless indirection but doesn't > cause harm. part of the patch is the __much_check, i redo that and submit that with some driver fixes later > If you want it to be removed submit patches to the drivers using it > instead of adding such warnings. Once your down to very few drivers > you can deprecate it. i'm happy to do so --- but it's not clear to me (1) is s/pci_module_init/pci_register_driver/ suffices or something else needs to be done (2) how this will affect drivers also used in 2.4.x, as jeff pointed out some drivers are identical (or could be) for both kernels. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/