Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261885AbUKCVHF (ORCPT ); Wed, 3 Nov 2004 16:07:05 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261887AbUKCVDj (ORCPT ); Wed, 3 Nov 2004 16:03:39 -0500 Received: from e2.ny.us.ibm.com ([32.97.182.102]:13528 "EHLO e2.ny.us.ibm.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261886AbUKCVBu (ORCPT ); Wed, 3 Nov 2004 16:01:50 -0500 Date: Wed, 03 Nov 2004 13:00:44 -0800 From: "Martin J. Bligh" To: Brent Casavant , Andi Kleen , colpatch@us.ibm.com cc: Hugh Dickins , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] Use MPOL_INTERLEAVE for tmpfs files Message-ID: <276730000.1099515644@flay> In-Reply-To: References: <239530000.1099435919@flay> <20041103090112.GJ8907@wotan.suse.de> X-Mailer: Mulberry/2.1.2 (Linux/x86) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 961 Lines: 26 --On Wednesday, November 03, 2004 10:32:56 -0600 Brent Casavant wrote: > On Wed, 3 Nov 2004, Andi Kleen wrote: > >> If you want to go more finegraid then you can always use numactl >> or even libnuma in the application. For a quick policy decision a sysctl >> is fine imho. > > OK, so I'm not seeing a definitive stance by the interested parties > either way. So since the code's already done, I'm posting the sysctl > method, and defaulting to on. I assume that if we later decide that > a mount option was correct after all, that it's no big deal to axe the > sysctl? Matt has volunteered to write the mount option for this, so let's hold off for a couple of days until that's done. M - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/