Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Tue, 24 Apr 2001 03:59:28 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Tue, 24 Apr 2001 03:59:18 -0400 Received: from juicer14.bigpond.com ([139.134.6.23]:54257 "EHLO mailin2.email.bigpond.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Tue, 24 Apr 2001 03:59:06 -0400 Message-Id: From: Rusty Russell To: Dale Amon Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Has the iptables security patch been vetted? In-Reply-To: Your message of "Mon, 23 Apr 2001 20:48:27 +0100." <20010423204825.H26083@vnl.com> Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2001 15:09:47 +1000 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In message <20010423204825.H26083@vnl.com> you write: > I'm sure you've run across this one: > > http://netfilter.samba.org/security-fix/ > > I'd like to know how official this patch is, ie how > well checked out? Hi Dale, The preferred patch is available, and has been tested (several new testsuite tests now exist) and submitted to Linus (et. al): http://netfilter.filewatcher.org/security-fix/ftp-security2.patch http://netfilter.samba.org/security-fix/ftp-security2.patch http://netfilter.gnumonks.org/security-fix/ftp-security2.patch Hope that helps, Rusty. -- Premature optmztion is rt of all evl. --DK - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/