Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S262047AbUKDB7s (ORCPT ); Wed, 3 Nov 2004 20:59:48 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S262044AbUKDB7s (ORCPT ); Wed, 3 Nov 2004 20:59:48 -0500 Received: from host157-148.pool8289.interbusiness.it ([82.89.148.157]:59283 "EHLO zion.localdomain") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S262047AbUKDBzN (ORCPT ); Wed, 3 Nov 2004 20:55:13 -0500 Subject: [patch 08/20] uml: mconsole_proc simplify and partial fix To: akpm@osdl.org Cc: jdike@addtoit.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, cw@f00f.org, blaisorblade_spam@yahoo.it, kraxel@bytesex.org From: blaisorblade_spam@yahoo.it Date: Thu, 04 Nov 2004 00:17:33 +0100 Message-Id: <20041103231733.43B8355C77@zion.localdomain> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 4972 Lines: 162 From: Gerd Knorr , and me, Paolo Giarrusso This is a rewrite of the mconsole_proc function. The old code had the problem that the kernel crashed after calling "uml_mconsole proc " a few times. I havn't tracked what exactly causes the problem, I guess trying to access the procfs without actually mounting it somewhere causes some corruption of kernel data structures. The new code simply openes /proc/ via sys_open(). That simplifies the function alot. It also doesn't crash any more ;) Also, from Paolo Giarrusso: When printing the content of a file through the "proc" command, make it begin on his own line. PROBLEMS: Drawback is that it only works when procfs is actually mounted below /proc. And within UML, often this is false, because when building honeypots we mount HPPFS under /proc to avoid the hacker recognizing he's attacking a UML instance. One suggestion I've received to fix the later issue was to mount the procfs within a kernel thread with a private namespace, but I havn't tried that so far. Instead, we'd like to fix the actual code of the mconsole_proc function. From "Anthony Brock" Anthony_Brock (at) ous (dot) edu comes a comment, suggesting where the bug lays (as noted in the source): removing part of the code (it seems the symlink lookup) there are no more crashes. Signed-off-by: Paolo 'Blaisorblade' Giarrusso --- vanilla-linux-2.6.9-paolo/arch/um/drivers/mconsole_kern.c | 94 +++++++++++++- 1 files changed, 93 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff -puN arch/um/drivers/mconsole_kern.c~uml-mconsole_proc-simplify-fix arch/um/drivers/mconsole_kern.c --- vanilla-linux-2.6.9/arch/um/drivers/mconsole_kern.c~uml-mconsole_proc-simplify-fix 2004-11-03 23:44:59.175564064 +0100 +++ vanilla-linux-2.6.9-paolo/arch/um/drivers/mconsole_kern.c 2004-11-03 23:44:59.178563608 +0100 @@ -119,12 +119,98 @@ void mconsole_log(struct mc_request *req mconsole_reply(req, "", 0, 0); } +/* This is a more convoluted version of mconsole_proc, which has some stability + * problems; however, we need it fixed, because it is expected that UML users + * mount HPPFS instead of procfs on /proc. And we want mconsole_proc to still + * show the real procfs content, not the ones from hppfs.*/ +#if 0 +void mconsole_proc(struct mc_request *req) +{ + struct nameidata nd; + struct file_system_type *proc; + struct super_block *super; + struct file *file; + int n, err; + char *ptr = req->request.data, *buf; + + ptr += strlen("proc"); + while(isspace(*ptr)) ptr++; + + proc = get_fs_type("proc"); + if(proc == NULL){ + mconsole_reply(req, "procfs not registered", 1, 0); + goto out; + } + + super = (*proc->get_sb)(proc, 0, NULL, NULL); + put_filesystem(proc); + if(super == NULL){ + mconsole_reply(req, "Failed to get procfs superblock", 1, 0); + goto out; + } + up_write(&super->s_umount); + + nd.dentry = super->s_root; + nd.mnt = NULL; + nd.flags = O_RDONLY + 1; + nd.last_type = LAST_ROOT; + + /* START: it was experienced that the stability problems are closed + * if commenting out these two calls + the below read cycle. To + * make UML crash again, it was enough to readd either one.*/ + err = link_path_walk(ptr, &nd); + if(err){ + mconsole_reply(req, "Failed to look up file", 1, 0); + goto out_kill; + } + + file = dentry_open(nd.dentry, nd.mnt, O_RDONLY); + if(IS_ERR(file)){ + mconsole_reply(req, "Failed to open file", 1, 0); + goto out_kill; + } + /*END*/ + + buf = kmalloc(PAGE_SIZE, GFP_KERNEL); + if(buf == NULL){ + mconsole_reply(req, "Failed to allocate buffer", 1, 0); + goto out_fput; + } + + if((file->f_op != NULL) && (file->f_op->read != NULL)){ + do { + n = (*file->f_op->read)(file, buf, PAGE_SIZE - 1, + &file->f_pos); + if(n >= 0){ + buf[n] = '\0'; + mconsole_reply(req, buf, 0, (n > 0)); + } + else { + mconsole_reply(req, "Read of file failed", + 1, 0); + goto out_free; + } + } while(n > 0); + } + else mconsole_reply(req, "", 0, 0); + + out_free: + kfree(buf); + out_fput: + fput(file); + out_kill: + deactivate_super(super); + out: ; +} +#endif + void mconsole_proc(struct mc_request *req) { char path[64]; char *buf; int len; int fd; + int first_chunk = 1; char *ptr = req->request.data; ptr += strlen("proc"); @@ -149,7 +235,13 @@ void mconsole_proc(struct mc_request *re if (len < 0) { mconsole_reply(req, "Read of file failed", 1, 0); goto out_free; - } else if (len == PAGE_SIZE-1) { + } + /*Begin the file content on his own line.*/ + if (first_chunk) { + mconsole_reply(req, "\n", 0, 1); + first_chunk = 0; + } + if (len == PAGE_SIZE-1) { buf[len] = '\0'; mconsole_reply(req, buf, 0, 1); } else { _ - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/