Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S262309AbUKDS24 (ORCPT ); Thu, 4 Nov 2004 13:28:56 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S262354AbUKDSRm (ORCPT ); Thu, 4 Nov 2004 13:17:42 -0500 Received: from peabody.ximian.com ([130.57.169.10]:26811 "EHLO peabody.ximian.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S262357AbUKDSQX (ORCPT ); Thu, 4 Nov 2004 13:16:23 -0500 Subject: Re: netlink vs kobject_uevent ordering From: Robert Love To: Greg KH Cc: Anton Blanchard , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, davem@redhat.com, herbert@gondor.apana.org.au, Kay Sievers In-Reply-To: <20041104180550.GA16744@kroah.com> References: <20041104154317.GA1268@krispykreme.ozlabs.ibm.com> <20041104180550.GA16744@kroah.com> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Thu, 04 Nov 2004 13:13:53 -0500 Message-Id: <1099592033.31022.138.camel@betsy.boston.ximian.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.0.1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 620 Lines: 23 On Thu, 2004-11-04 at 10:05 -0800, Greg KH wrote: > So, Robert and Kay, any thoughts as to how this has ever worked at boot > time in the past? Weird. I don't have a clue, but clearly it did work. Similar thing here: c04b60cc t __initcall_kobject_uevent_init c04b60d0 t __initcall_netlink_proto_init Dunno why it ever worked, but it at least used to. Robert Love - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/