Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S262406AbUKDTls (ORCPT ); Thu, 4 Nov 2004 14:41:48 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S262400AbUKDTk4 (ORCPT ); Thu, 4 Nov 2004 14:40:56 -0500 Received: from omx1-ext.sgi.com ([192.48.179.11]:53195 "EHLO omx1.americas.sgi.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S262381AbUKDTgv (ORCPT ); Thu, 4 Nov 2004 14:36:51 -0500 Date: Thu, 4 Nov 2004 13:36:29 -0600 From: Jack Steiner To: Andi Kleen Cc: Erich Focht , Takayoshi Kochi , linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Externalize SLIT table Message-ID: <20041104193629.GA22887@sgi.com> References: <20041103205655.GA5084@sgi.com> <20041104.105908.18574694.t-kochi@bq.jp.nec.com> <20041104141337.GA18445@sgi.com> <200411041631.42627.efocht@hpce.nec.com> <20041104170435.GA19687@wotan.suse.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20041104170435.GA19687@wotan.suse.de> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1581 Lines: 41 On Thu, Nov 04, 2004 at 06:04:35PM +0100, Andi Kleen wrote: > On Thu, Nov 04, 2004 at 04:31:42PM +0100, Erich Focht wrote: > > On Thursday 04 November 2004 15:13, Jack Steiner wrote: > > > I think it would also be useful to have a similar cpu-to-cpu distance > > > metric: > > > ????????% cat /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu0/distance > > > ????????10 20 40 60 > > > > > > This gives the same information but is cpu-centric rather than > > > node centric. > > > > I don't see the use of that once you have some way to find the logical > > CPU to node number mapping. The "node distances" are meant to be > > I think he wants it just to have a more convenient interface, > which is not necessarily a bad thing. But then one could put the > convenience into libnuma anyways. > > -Andi Yes, strictly convenience. Most of the cases that I have seen deal with cpu placement & cpu distances from each other. I agree that cpu-to-cpu distances can be determined by converting to nodes & finding the node-to-node distance. A second reason is symmetry. If there is a /sys/devices/system/node/node0/distance metric, it seems as though there should also be a /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu0/distance metric. -- Thanks Jack Steiner (steiner@sgi.com) 651-683-5302 Principal Engineer SGI - Silicon Graphics, Inc. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/