Date: Thu, 4 Nov 2004 11:32:19 -0800
From: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>
To: Robert Love <rml@novell.com>
Cc: greg@kroah.com, anton@samba.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
       davem@redhat.com, herbert@gondor.apana.org.au, kay.sievers@vrfy.org
Subject: Re: netlink vs kobject_uevent ordering
Message-Id: <20041104113219.10770b35.davem@davemloft.net>
In-Reply-To: <1099592033.31022.138.camel@betsy.boston.ximian.com>
References: <20041104154317.GA1268@krispykreme.ozlabs.ibm.com>
	<20041104180550.GA16744@kroah.com>
	<1099592033.31022.138.camel@betsy.boston.ximian.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 683
Lines: 18

On Thu, 04 Nov 2004 13:13:53 -0500
Robert Love <rml@novell.com> wrote:

> On Thu, 2004-11-04 at 10:05 -0800, Greg KH wrote:
> 
> > So, Robert and Kay, any thoughts as to how this has ever worked at boot
> > time in the past?
> 
> Weird.  I don't have a clue, but clearly it did work.

It might have really failing recently because nl_table in
net/netlink/af_netlink.c has become dynamically allocated
memory setup by netlink_proto_init().
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/