Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S262397AbUKDUP4 (ORCPT ); Thu, 4 Nov 2004 15:15:56 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S262405AbUKDUPs (ORCPT ); Thu, 4 Nov 2004 15:15:48 -0500 Received: from holomorphy.com ([207.189.100.168]:65192 "EHLO holomorphy.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S262397AbUKDUM7 (ORCPT ); Thu, 4 Nov 2004 15:12:59 -0500 Date: Thu, 4 Nov 2004 12:12:57 -0800 From: William Lee Irwin III To: Jesse Barnes Cc: Jack Steiner , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, edwardsg@sgi.com Subject: Re: contention on profile_lock Message-ID: <20041104201257.GA14786@holomorphy.com> References: <200411021152.16038.jbarnes@engr.sgi.com> <20041102200222.GA5135@sgi.com> <200411021342.36918.jbarnes@engr.sgi.com> <200411041156.23559.jbarnes@engr.sgi.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200411041156.23559.jbarnes@engr.sgi.com> Organization: The Domain of Holomorphy User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040722i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 584 Lines: 14 On Thu, Nov 04, 2004 at 11:56:23AM -0800, Jesse Barnes wrote: > ..but since I haven't heard from Dipankar, here's a patch that removes the > profile_hook notifier list altogether in favor of a simple flag that controls > whether or not to call the oprofile timer routine directly. Does it look ok? This looks reasonable to me. -- wli - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/