Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S262706AbUKEOqk (ORCPT ); Fri, 5 Nov 2004 09:46:40 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S262707AbUKEOqj (ORCPT ); Fri, 5 Nov 2004 09:46:39 -0500 Received: from covert.brown-ring.iadfw.net ([209.196.123.142]:2319 "EHLO covert.brown-ring.iadfw.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S262706AbUKEOq0 (ORCPT ); Fri, 5 Nov 2004 09:46:26 -0500 From: "Art Haas" Date: Fri, 5 Nov 2004 08:46:21 -0600 To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Kernel memory requirements and BK Message-ID: <20041105144621.GC7724@artsapartment.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040907i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 3052 Lines: 62 Hi. I've been having problems with 'bk pull' execution when using kernels after the 2.6.8/2.6.8.1 releases. My machine has 192M of memory and 100M of swap, so I believe that the memory requirements for using BK to keep up with the kernel is sufficient, and when the machine is running with a 2.6.8.1 kernel I can 'bk pull' even if X windows is running. With the 2.6.9 and 2.6.10-rc kernels, BK bombs out with out-of-memory errors once the repository checking begins. I've run the 'bk pull' under the newer kernels without X running, as well as shutting down various daemons, and still things fail with memory errors. Here's a snippet of /var/log/messages under 2.6.10-rc1 when a 'bk pull' fails: kernel: oom-killer: gfp_mask=0xd2 kernel: DMA per-cpu: kernel: cpu 0 hot: low 2, high 6, batch 1 kernel: cpu 0 cold: low 0, high 2, batch 1 kernel: Normal per-cpu: kernel: cpu 0 hot: low 22, high 66, batch 11 kernel: cpu 0 cold: low 0, high 22, batch 11 kernel: HighMem per-cpu: empty kernel: kernel: Free pages: 420kB (0kB HighMem) kernel: Active:45877 inactive:64 dirty:0 writeback:0 unstable:0 free:105 slab:1451 mapped:45846 pagetables:195 kernel: DMA free:36kB min:36kB low:72kB high:108kB active:13684kB inactive:0kB present:16384kB pages_scanned:14695 all_unreclaimable? yes kernel: protections[]: 0 0 0 kernel: Normal free:384kB min:400kB low:800kB high:1200kB active:169824kB inactive:256kB present:180224kB pages_scanned:214215 all_unreclaimable? yes kernel: protections[]: 0 0 0 kernel: HighMem free:0kB min:128kB low:256kB high:384kB active:0kB inactive:0kB present:0kB pages_scanned:0 all_unreclaimable? no kernel: protections[]: 0 0 0 kernel: DMA: 1*4kB 0*8kB 0*16kB 1*32kB 0*64kB 0*128kB 0*256kB 0*512kB 0*1024kB 0*2048kB 0*4096kB = 36kB kernel: Normal: 0*4kB 0*8kB 0*16kB 0*32kB 0*64kB 1*128kB 1*256kB 0*512kB 0*1024kB 0*2048kB 0*4096kB = 384kB kernel: HighMem: empty kernel: Swap cache: add 110618, delete 108152, find 38132/44306, race 0+1 The machine used to have only 128M of memory, and 'bk pull' worked albiet _very_ slowly as the machine went heavily into swap space usage, but it seemed that once the number of files went over 20,000 or so I had to add more memory, and then once again 'bk pull' worked without any problem. I realize that there have been many, many changes to the kernel between 2.6.8 and the current BK, but my configuration for my builds has remained mostly the same, so I am at somewhat of a loss to figure out just where the extra memory usage is coming from. Is there a known set of changes that explain the additional memory requirements? Art Haas -- Man once surrendering his reason, has no remaining guard against absurdities the most monstrous, and like a ship without rudder, is the sport of every wind. -Thomas Jefferson to James Smith, 1822 - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/