Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261210AbUKEVOI (ORCPT ); Fri, 5 Nov 2004 16:14:08 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261213AbUKEVOI (ORCPT ); Fri, 5 Nov 2004 16:14:08 -0500 Received: from pimout2-ext.prodigy.net ([207.115.63.101]:8352 "EHLO pimout2-ext.prodigy.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261210AbUKEVOG (ORCPT ); Fri, 5 Nov 2004 16:14:06 -0500 Date: Fri, 5 Nov 2004 13:13:49 -0800 From: Chris Wedgwood To: "Adam J. Richter" Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] major devfs shrink based on tmpfs and lookup traps Message-ID: <20041105211349.GA17340@taniwha.stupidest.org> References: <200411061021.iA6ALa403415@freya.yggdrasil.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200411061021.iA6ALa403415@freya.yggdrasil.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 703 Lines: 16 On Sat, Nov 06, 2004 at 02:21:36AM -0800, Adam J. Richter wrote: > This patch is a replacement implementation of devfs. This patch > combined the tmpfs "lookup traps" patch that is required for certain > devfs functionality are a net deletion of more than 1800 lines of > code[1]. The code that actually remains in fs/devfs has a > .text+.data size of under 3kB. wow, that's pretty neat.... but isn't devfs going to be killed off sooner or later anyhow? - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/