Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Tue, 7 Nov 2000 00:24:19 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Tue, 7 Nov 2000 00:24:10 -0500 Received: from twinlark.arctic.org ([204.107.140.52]:64780 "HELO twinlark.arctic.org") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id ; Tue, 7 Nov 2000 00:23:58 -0500 Date: Mon, 6 Nov 2000 21:23:57 -0800 (PST) From: dean gaudet To: Linus Torvalds cc: Andrew Morton , Alan Cox , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] Re: Negative scalability by removal of In-Reply-To: Message-ID: X-comment: visit http://arctic.org/~dean/legal for information regarding copyright and disclaimer. MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, 6 Nov 2000, Linus Torvalds wrote: > This is why I'd love to _not_ see silly work-arounds in apache hey, maybe it's time for me to repeat something that i'm often quoted as saying: apache is about correctness first, and performance second. i don't think that's silly personally. remember most websites can be served fine off an anemic 486/33 with one ethernet port tied behind its back while doing a three legged race with a 6502 up a hill in san francisco during el nino. don't let the benchmarks fool ya! it's generally more important that a server be able to fork perl and parse CGIs fast than it is for it to accept an extra 1000 conns/s. apache-1.3.15 defines SINGLE_LISTEN_UNSERIALIZED_ACCEPT on linux 2.2 and later. dunno when the release date will be... someone go find a security flaw and it'll push up the release ;) (p.s. and rbb promised to forward the change into 2.0 and rse said he'd forward the change into mm, all of which were based off the same code.) -dean - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/