Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261285AbUKFDWS (ORCPT ); Fri, 5 Nov 2004 22:22:18 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261301AbUKFDWS (ORCPT ); Fri, 5 Nov 2004 22:22:18 -0500 Received: from smtpout.mac.com ([17.250.248.86]:50157 "EHLO smtpout.mac.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261285AbUKFDWO (ORCPT ); Fri, 5 Nov 2004 22:22:14 -0500 In-Reply-To: <200411051906.iA5J6XJd014410@laptop11.inf.utfsm.cl> References: <200411051906.iA5J6XJd014410@laptop11.inf.utfsm.cl> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v619) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Message-Id: <01C20E37-2FA3-11D9-857E-000393ACC76E@mac.com> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: jp@enix.org, "Adam J. Richter" , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, davids@webmaster.com From: Kyle Moffett Subject: Re: Possible GPL infringement in Broadcom-based routers Date: Fri, 5 Nov 2004 22:21:53 -0500 To: Horst von Brand X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.619) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1658 Lines: 42 On Nov 05, 2004, at 14:06, Horst von Brand wrote: > This is nonsense: If so, I'd be commiting a crime each time I fire up > emacs > on Solaris (linking (GPLed) emacs to (propietary) libc in RAM). [Yes, > just > an example; haven't done so for the best part of 5 years now...] What you do with the GPL _on_your_computer_ is not relevant. libc is a standard interface, which is used by many programs, much the same way that a keyboard is a standard interface to a computer. You don't see companies with copyright to _all_ keyboards, do you? ;-D > Besides, Linus has _explicitly_ said that binary (closed source) > modules > are OK (under certain conditions). And AFAIU there was legitimate > discussion wether this particular excemption was required at al. This, of course, would assume that said code is compiled as a module. I posted earlier some available makefile snippets from the code that they _do_ distribute that shows they do _not_ link it as a module, but directly into the kernel. Last I saw, NVidia couldn't distribute kernels with their modules compiled directly into the binary. Cheers, Kyle Moffett -----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK----- Version: 3.12 GCM/CS/IT/U d- s++: a17 C++++>$ UB/L/X/*++++(+)>$ P+++(++++)>$ L++++(+++) E W++(+) N+++(++) o? K? w--- O? M++ V? PS+() PE+(-) Y+ PGP+++ t+(+++) 5 X R? tv-(--) b++++(++) DI+ D+ G e->++++$ h!*()>++$ r !y?(-) ------END GEEK CODE BLOCK------ - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/