Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Tue, 24 Apr 2001 10:18:38 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Tue, 24 Apr 2001 10:18:28 -0400 Received: from router-100M.swansea.linux.org.uk ([194.168.151.17]:20492 "EHLO the-village.bc.nu") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Tue, 24 Apr 2001 10:18:23 -0400 Subject: Re: [OFFTOPIC] Re: [PATCH] Single user linux To: viro@math.psu.edu (Alexander Viro) Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2001 15:18:11 +0100 (BST) Cc: mhaque@haque.net (Mohammad A. Haque), ttel5535@artax.karlin.mff.cuni.cz, mharris@opensourceadvocate.org (Mike A. Harris), linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: from "Alexander Viro" at Apr 24, 2001 09:40:14 AM X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.5 PL1] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: From: Alan Cox Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > On Tue, 24 Apr 2001, Mohammad A. Haque wrote: > > Correct. <1024 requires root to bind to the port. > ... And nothing says that it should be done by daemon itself. Or that you shouldnt let inetd do it for you And that you shouldn't drop the capabilities except that bind It is possible to implement the entire mail system without anything running as root but xinetd. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/