Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Tue, 24 Apr 2001 10:23:18 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Tue, 24 Apr 2001 10:22:58 -0400 Received: from leibniz.math.psu.edu ([146.186.130.2]:62445 "EHLO math.psu.edu") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Tue, 24 Apr 2001 10:22:53 -0400 Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2001 10:22:52 -0400 (EDT) From: Alexander Viro To: Alan Cox cc: "Mohammad A. Haque" , ttel5535@artax.karlin.mff.cuni.cz, "Mike A. Harris" , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [OFFTOPIC] Re: [PATCH] Single user linux In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, 24 Apr 2001, Alan Cox wrote: > > On Tue, 24 Apr 2001, Mohammad A. Haque wrote: > > > Correct. <1024 requires root to bind to the port. > > ... And nothing says that it should be done by daemon itself. > > Or that you shouldnt let inetd do it for you > And that you shouldn't drop the capabilities except that bind > > It is possible to implement the entire mail system without anything running > as root but xinetd. You want an MDA with elevated privileges, though... - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/