Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261638AbUKGVKE (ORCPT ); Sun, 7 Nov 2004 16:10:04 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261656AbUKGVKE (ORCPT ); Sun, 7 Nov 2004 16:10:04 -0500 Received: from holomorphy.com ([207.189.100.168]:38287 "EHLO holomorphy.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261638AbUKGVJz (ORCPT ); Sun, 7 Nov 2004 16:09:55 -0500 Date: Sun, 7 Nov 2004 13:09:43 -0800 From: William Lee Irwin III To: Anton Blanchard Cc: David Gibson , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc64-dev@ozlabs.org, Adam Litke , Andy Whitworth Subject: Re: [RFC] Consolidate lots of hugepage code Message-ID: <20041107210943.GN2890@holomorphy.com> References: <20041029033708.GF12247@zax> <20041029034817.GY12934@holomorphy.com> <20041107172030.GA16976@krispykreme.ozlabs.ibm.com> <20041107192024.GM2890@holomorphy.com> <20041107193007.GC16976@krispykreme.ozlabs.ibm.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20041107193007.GC16976@krispykreme.ozlabs.ibm.com> Organization: The Domain of Holomorphy User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040722i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1284 Lines: 28 At some point in the past, I wrote: >> The second is a triplefault on x86-64 under some >> condition involving a long-running database regression test. There has >> obviously been considerably less progress there in no small part due to >> the amount of time required to reproduce the issue. On Mon, Nov 08, 2004 at 06:30:07AM +1100, Anton Blanchard wrote: > OK. We have not seen a similar issue on ppc64 even with extensive > testing (although with HPC apps). The question is how long we should > hold off on further hugetlb development waiting for this one bug report > on a single architecture to be chased. Until it's fixed. Until then I'm considering it a byproduct of that same development. And with your report, that makes it two architectures, not one. The concepts of the features etc. are all generally okay, though very buzzword-centric. In general the audits and sweeps have been lacking thoroughness in the architecture-specific areas. I expect that particular issue to have been the cause of these two bugreports. -- wli - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/